You just want to pretend it is because it happens to be yours. Let's not act like one assumption is more fact based than the other. To those whó are not famiIiar, this is á variation of Jasón Vorhees that wás not based ón any of thé films released. You haven't provided "more evidence" that it will, you just stated an opinion. Savini Jason Whén the Xbox 0ne update rolled óut a few dáys ago, several pIayers have discovered thát the Savini Jasón skin was avaiIable and on-saIe. Presenting the definition of a word doesn't mean you're applying it correctly. Maybe you're right but I see nothing pointing to it being a likely outcome. You think that just because you think that. Your assumption is that people would be more willing to buy a 40 dollar game because they added a single charactor that they would have to pay 6 extra dollars for. Maybe I'm wrong but that's a reasonable thought process to have with those numbers. The fact that there are a handful out of several hundred thousand owners complaining leads me to believe most don't care. Nothing was "wild" about anything I said. My assumption is that adding a $6 dollar add-on isn't going to boost sales.
Words have meaning and context is important. Probable - having more evidence for than against, or evidence that inclines the mind to belief but leaves some room for doubt I am presenting a possible solution to a PR problem, based on logic and a regard for positive outcomes for all parties involved while acknowledging no guarantee of said outcomes. The difference is you are presenting wild assumptions as facts. This particular post said that they'd revoke the content keys from sellers if they identified who was doing the selling, but it didn't mention anything about banning players who bought the content as they 've discussed in the past.Ursprünglich geschrieben von Jack Rabbit Slim:Now you're just being petty, so let me clarify something then I'm done with this tangent. Another discussion posted later on advised players not to attempt to purchase the content from third party sites such as eBay, saying that there was no way they could help players if they got scammed. They went on in the post to say that those who didn't take the opportunity when they could "missed out," and that the content would most definitely not be sold again. They are the people that took a chance on a campaign that has produced a game that is overall fun." They are for those that backed us and have been with us from the beginning. "So here we are and here is where we are always going to stand that skin and those clothing items are not for sale.
"We made that clear on Day 1 of the Backerkit that these two DLC were for backers both Kickstarter and Backerkit," the Steam post from the developers read, referencing the Savini Jason and a clothing pack.
0 kommentar(er)
